[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: New tool
I have no problem with you committing such. Might be interesting
to extend the whoami test to use it. (Proxy authorization can
apply without use of SASL.)
Kurt
At 08:47 AM 4/14/2004, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
>BTW, I have a bunch of changes to data/test.ldif and
>data/test-ordered.ldif to add saslAuthzFrom values to some entries, in
>view of a possible test on saslAuthz stuff. Is it OK if I commit it, or
>is it going to break anything in other scripts? I think code related to
>this stuff (e.g. builtin schema and so) is always compiled by default if
>one compiles slapd, but I'm not sure I got all the odds of the test suite.
>
>Ando.
>
>>
>>> add slapsaslauth test tool
>>
>> I just added a new tool: slapsaslauth. It is intended to test the sasl
>> configuration, significantly the sasl-regexp stuff. At present it's
>> very rough. Since it needs to access to databases as if the server were
>> running, it should work in SERVER rather than in TOOL mode; to run it in
>> TOOL mode will require some tweaking, which I started in back-ldbm
>> (seems to pass my test cases right now), while the behavior with
>> back-bdb, without any changes yet, is still a bit erratic.
>>
>> Comments?.
>>
>> --
>> Pierangelo Masarati
>> mailto:pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it
>
>
>--
>Pierangelo Masarati
>mailto:pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it