Re: NT, slurpd, rambling

["Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>]

At 03:33 AM 3/3/2003, Howard Chu wrote:
>A long time ago when I first noticed this, I thought - why don't we have
>slurpd replace the replog file with a FIFO, named pipe, Unix domain socket,
>whatever, when it starts up, and then it can just sit in a blocking read on
>that? There's a problem of what to do if slurpd exits 

The approach used by at least one U-Mich derived commercial LDAP
server is to integrate slurpd(8) into slapd(8).... (yuk).

Kurt