[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: RE24 testing call (2.4.48) LMDB RE0.9 testing call (0.9.24)

To: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>, openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: RE24 testing call (2.4.48) LMDB RE0.9 testing call (0.9.24)
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:20:09 -0700
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <e73564ca-624b-f54f-9b42-04e27b1345db@stroeder.com>
References: <DE273198FC0A963A5F733B11@[192.168.1.39]> <08c65014-2123-ec5e-80b0-d1efae91f572@stroeder.com> <93208BFBE159603086D22E26@[192.168.1.39]> <e73564ca-624b-f54f-9b42-04e27b1345db@stroeder.com>

--On Tuesday, July 16, 2019 1:17 AM +0200 Michael Ströder<michael@stroeder.com> wrote:

I'm wondering if it was relying on one of the bugs in libldap/liblber
that got fixed.


The libldap lines in CHANGES do not ring a bell at my side.
Can you point me to a candidate?


ITS#8450, ITS#7996 perhaps? they change the mutex initializations.

It would be interesting to see a gdb stack trace of the process of 2.4.47vs 2.4.48.


--Quanah


--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Product Architect
Symas Corporation
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:
<http://www.symas.com>

References:
- RE24 testing call (2.4.48) LMDB RE0.9 testing call (0.9.24)
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com>
- Re: RE24 testing call (2.4.48) LMDB RE0.9 testing call (0.9.24)
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
- Re: RE24 testing call (2.4.48) LMDB RE0.9 testing call (0.9.24)
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com>
- Re: RE24 testing call (2.4.48) LMDB RE0.9 testing call (0.9.24)
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>

Prev by Date: Re: RE24 testing call (2.4.48) LMDB RE0.9 testing call (0.9.24)
Next by Date: Re: Openldap issues user issues after updating user groups
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread