[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: LDAPS Support

To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: LDAPS Support
From: Dieter Klünter <dieter@dkluenter.de>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 20:59:02 +0200
In-reply-to: <d04ae20e62569824aa3dddb11f9693a0@tomjay.co.uk>
Organization: AVCI
References: <d04ae20e62569824aa3dddb11f9693a0@tomjay.co.uk>

Am Tue, 05 Jun 2018 03:36:11 +0100
schrieb web@tomjay.co.uk:

> Hello,
> 
> I'm under the impression that LDAPS (and not StartTLS) has been 
> depreciated in OpenLDAP, but I can't find anything on the OpenLDAP 
> website that says this. Is this the case, and is there a reference
> for it?

RFC 4511 and 4513 are quite clear about this. While start TLS is defined
in RFC 2830, there is no formal specification for ldaps, furthermore
read on ldaps in /etc/services.

-Dieter

-- 
Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung
http://sys4.de
GPG Key ID: E9ED159B
53°37'09,95"N
10°08'02,42"E

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LDAPS Support
  - From: Ozgur K <mueddib@openldap.org>

References:
- LDAPS Support
  - From: web@tomjay.co.uk

Prev by Date: Re: Issue with ignoring case on memberUid
Next by Date: Re: LDAPS Support
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread