[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: openldap 2.4.44 + ITS 8432 patch still infinitely replicates
- To: "'Quanah Gibson-Mount'" <quanah@zimbra.com>, "'Howard Chu'" <hyc@symas.com>, <openldap-technical@openldap.org>
- Subject: RE: openldap 2.4.44 + ITS 8432 patch still infinitely replicates
- From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 13:40:22 -0700
- Content-language: en-us
- In-reply-to: <563B843253CE47602CBCD666@[192.168.1.19]>
- References: <20160721062515.GS21421@bender.unx.cpp.edu> <WM!2b9e8154a10358092e4fc35f9cd9205ed7248ed41e41c8c37f4a0fb26f7281b229b90c24064a3c6ddabb976139136ae2!@mailstronghold-3.zmailcloud.com> <5790A57A.7090403@symas.com> <0bc901d1e392$b9192be0$2b4b83a0$@acm.org> <F37C698975BC757FBF05282A@[192.168.1.19]> <563B843253CE47602CBCD666@[192.168.1.19]>
- Thread-index: AQKrNxBCe7AQof2y6Sljcu1IjI9v/QL9wCW1AN3tLQQBXSWzuQKFP3t/AWEeZlWeL5MrQA==
> From: Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 10:40 AM
>
> Also see ITS 8448.
Ah, thanks much for the heads up on these additional issues. Perhaps it
would be safest for me to stick with 2.4.41 until a 2.4.45 is officially
released with fixes for both the replication loop and possible fallout from
its fix :). We've been pretty lucky with 2.4.41, knock on bits, it's been
very stable with no issues or problems that I've seen while we've been
running it.
> --On Thursday, July 21, 2016 5:47 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
> <quanah@zimbra.com> wrote:
>
> > I would note that I've opened up two new ITSes for problems that only
> > occur on systems that have the ITS8432 fix. Still waiting on fixes for
> > those, which is why I haven't pushed the fix into RE24 yet.
> >
> > ITSes 8460 and 8462.
> >
> > --Quanah
> >
> > --On Thursday, July 21, 2016 2:59 PM -0700 "Paul B. Henson"
> > <henson@acm.org> wrote:
> >
> >>> From: Howard Chu
> >>> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 3:36 AM
> >>>
> >>> The fix for #8432 only prevents the redundant mod from being
> processed
> >>> on a particular node. If other nodes are still accepting the redundant
> >>> op
> >> then yes,
> >>> it will continue to propagate. So yes, you need the patched code on
all
> >>> nodes.
> >>
> >> Okay, thanks for the clarification. I usually stage updates to avoid a
> >> complete outage at any given time. It's interesting though that I had
> >> never seen this problem running 2.4.41 until I introduced a 2.4.44
system
> >> into the mix, and then it went away once I reverted that system back to
> >> 2.4.41. I wonder why that combination caused it to pop up suddenly.
I'll
> >> have to schedule a downtime window and update them all at once and
> see
> >> what happens.
> >>
> >> By any chance have you had the time to look at ITS 8444? The reporter
> >> says he sees a similar circular replication issue when the memberOf
> >> overlay is enabled, which we also use.
> >>
> >> Thanks much.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Quanah Gibson-Mount
> > Platform Architect
> > Manager, Systems Team
> > Zimbra, Inc.
> > --------------------
> > Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
> > A division of Synacor, Inc
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Platform Architect
> Manager, Systems Team
> Zimbra, Inc.
> --------------------
> Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
> A division of Synacor, Inc