[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: is there a bug with SSSD



Dieter Klünter wrote:
> Am Mon, 18 Jul 2016 16:03:22 +0000
> schrieb Kaveh Ehsani <kee2006@med.cornell.edu>:
>> I have tried using SSSD to switch between ldap provider and consumer.
>>
>> I have:
>>
>> ldap_uri = provider.example.com
>>
>> ldap_backup_uri = consumer.example.com
>>
>>
>> It works fine, until I stop the provider to see if the clients will
>> look at the consumer. They don't.
> [...]
> 
> sssd is not the best solution for load balancing. You may run sssd(8) 
> in debugging mode in order to get more information.

sssd could be blamed for lots of subtle bugs. But fail-over works with sssd 1.9+
reasonable well even with stupid DNS round-robin.

The original poster did not provide any useful information at all.
So it's impossible to give a meaningful answer.

https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/Troubleshooting

Also this question is surely better asked on sssd-users mailing list.

Ciao, Michael.


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature