Re: what databases are to be replicated for a slave?

[Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>]

--On Monday, December 28, 2015 10:44 AM +0400 Jephte Clain 
<jephte.clain@univ-reunion.fr> wrote:

> hello,
>
> I've had problems with an upgrade to openldap 2.4.43, and I reviewed my
> configuration to check for errors
> I have two slaves which replicate all databases from the master,
> including cn=config.

If the replicas are replicating the provider's cn=config, I doubt they are 
truly replicas.

> My reasoning is in case of a severe crash, I'd like one of the slaves to
> be able to become the new master.
> To allow such a scenario, each database in the master have a syncrepl
> directive to replicate from itself. It obviously have no effect on the
> master, but the slave that replicate this configuration get the right
> directives to replicate from the master. so far so good...
>
> now this is my question: should/could the accesslog configured this way?
> or should the accesslog be strictly local to a server? I mean, should I
> remove the syncrepl directive from the accesslog database?

I'm not sure what you mean about a syncrepl directive on the accesslog DB. 
That sounds like an incorrect configuration.

--Quanah

--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration