[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
basedn vs binddn
To
:
"
openldap-technical@openldap.org
" <
openldap-technical@openldap.org
>
Subject
:
basedn vs binddn
From
:
Kaushal Shriyan <
kaushalshriyan@gmail.com
>
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 16:03:08 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=gFFIehq+ZPopM+fuhXjV/Zib5vVIbGl4DdD+2aNBzoA=; b=GvkUZvTLQQgWMxN5ov5I5fuTaeNrBp5y10DLeLkYIuYA+Tie+Tv2Lu/STRyu9iHqGl sdIIXnQgPS1HlGdg13TE9b0CIG+hj7DKXL/VcId3rB3bvSYxumTrUteyFvnurgtJQQ8j CX9Nf9ejNwUiUEWrOAvFMR81XBJgTUV/eIgDkxZuNbejXnn4gmL2LXQaQwDdP+L94SWp jFMGcrYnc4uGOd+M5TRJIOPwBu75jIL0O8uDKfB70sYetMf+JrxUKnopa2KDKRcSEE48 uA2y1WaRssswTYbVeQDj0seaP3b9/sODBhejtHKkB5hqLNfoLFDzlwfD5TaHv3gM0mlx zNiQ==
Hi,
I am currently referring to
http://www.openldap.org/doc/admin24/
I have still not understood the difference between basedn and binddn. I will appreciate if somebody can help me understand with some examples.
Regards,
Kaushal
Follow-Ups
:
Re: basedn vs binddn
From:
Johannes Löthberg <johannes@kyriasis.com>
Prev by Date:
ldapmodrdn accented characters with windows client
Next by Date:
Re: uniqueness constraint violated when using ldapadd -M
Index(es):
Chronological
Thread