[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: LMDB and HP-UX Itanium
- To: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>, openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Subject: Re: LMDB and HP-UX Itanium
- From: Kristian Amlie <kristian.amlie@cfengine.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:49:00 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cfengine.com; s=google; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eGN3u/mOQN+lnAoyiujU2AzLqvapDbsLhKuiv01ayNE=; b=jt8OVp+FoSdqrfIusSnxN4WK/GU8HHBbB8BCf0k3oS+H/FU1qAPaN5ok6iwvij8J0v wk98lfcLUMUI8hc/5kmgvRvxNrJSWVav7dtH2XNZ62N7ChzMBBFoxsDFT2v87AYlzTHP ABVn3eX+uOPyKNFkkGPYn+4j/wbyv+yIh7Yro=
- In-reply-to: <54E6021C.2000003@symas.com>
- References: <54E59B0B.1070401@cfengine.com> <54E6021C.2000003@symas.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
On 19/02/15 16:32, Howard Chu wrote:
> Kristian Amlie wrote:
>> I'm wondering if the LMDB database has been tested on HP-UX with the
>> Itanium processor?
>
> Yes, but not in the past couple years.
>
>> We are trying to use the database there and are
>> seeing strange errors that don't occur on other platforms. Examples are
>> assertions when trying to do cross process access and values not making
>> it into the database correctly.
>
> Did you define the correct CACHELINE size?
I hadn't, but I tried it now. Seems to have no effect, but I suppose
CACHELINE size would only affect performance? It's anyway a good tip, I
will enable it for HP-UX regardless.
Any idea what else it could be?
--
Kristian