[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ITS #7161, ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better than 1 second

To: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Subject: Re: ITS #7161, ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better than 1 second
From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 12:23:55 -0700
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
Content-disposition: inline
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=VGDRGXn+ofW/LysRDGHetzmS/XyKzgEHbx8jrfg08d0=; b=RkEyUlJtksOaCGOGlu6RLmtBhYEZt02VVfZ3Io2Db4CpF2tnwmt9URptzgWVxSjpCK kpgDTGW0XRQiwrT/ZuGLt7NMJBfitKhVmql5tgcjGXrXTlsLYqAXr5bumP3prTwKk7Lv J4u/cHVHzSsTDRjZC+4XeNNPsh4JN308OCKDQtsIuDj/LH3uFZWRtbSkETYZe9BIDbov aZ1dsVhnRqQaUG74LB2KZrD0BKc3aOeG1Ht9qhUYIe92Q63FE5V+eKN10FnracXrAY34 Wdt9Kp9ejec8SDWX9GP4X9+j4asQ42+HKI5V/kXmOy4SFMeO6EPB5hDyrCSHBgo/V5MO 8iow==
In-reply-to: <539E065F.9060806@symas.com>
References: <20140523232454.GU1367@bender.unx.csupomona.edu> <537FE80E.9070808@symas.com> <03de01cf76f6$5b55dd60$12019820$@acm.org> <53801726.6090309@symas.com> <20140531000918.GG1541@bender.unx.csupomona.edu> <539D99D4.9000408@symas.com> <20140615194740.GJ1541@bender.unx.csupomona.edu> <539DFA72.5070601@symas.com> <20140615202745.GK1541@bender.unx.csupomona.edu> <539E065F.9060806@symas.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 01:47:27PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:

> Passes test022, committed to master.

Cool, much appreciated. Any chance of backporting it to RE24? It
actually applies cleanly, with just a couple offsets. Unless I'm not
thinking of something, it should be backwards compatible with the
existing code.

Thanks...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ITS #7161, ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better than 1 second
  - From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>

References:
- Re: ITS #7161, ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better than 1 second
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- Re: ITS #7161, ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better than 1 second
  - From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
- Re: ITS #7161, ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better than 1 second
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- Re: ITS #7161, ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better than 1 second
  - From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
- Re: ITS #7161, ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better than 1 second
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

Prev by Date: Re: ITS #7161, ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better than 1 second
Next by Date: Re: ITS #7161, ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better than 1 second
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread