[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Antw: Re: strategy for getting groupOfNames (AD) and posixAccount (Unix) to coexist?

To: "Philip Colmer" <philip.colmer@linaro.org>, <openldap-technical@openldap.org>
Subject: Antw: Re: strategy for getting groupOfNames (AD) and posixAccount (Unix) to coexist?
From: "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:16:07 +0100
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <CAKTSSTjVSFg_Cn6HuzhZWnmu4PObxTYhbwt8aokB-3AYYE5BfA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <651402065.18933.1393009966826.JavaMail.root@standard.k12.ca.us> <1530492157.19050.1393010052750.JavaMail.root@standard.k12.ca.us> <20140222075558.32a4b198@pink.avci.de> <CAKTSSTjVSFg_Cn6HuzhZWnmu4PObxTYhbwt8aokB-3AYYE5BfA@mail.gmail.com>

>>> Philip Colmer <philip.colmer@linaro.org> schrieb am 24.02.2014 um 10:43 in
Nachricht

[...]
> 3. rfc2307bis has expired so there won't be much (any?) application support
> for it. One of my key criteria when designing how our LDAP system was set
> up was to use classes that applications/systems were expecting to find.
[...]

So what did replace "rfc2307bis"? IMHO until there is a replacement, the old schema will continue to be used.

Regards,
Ulrich

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: strategy for getting groupOfNames (AD) and posixAccount (Unix) to coexist?
  - From: Philip Colmer <philip.colmer@linaro.org>

References:
- strategy for getting groupOfNames (AD) and posixAccount (Unix) to coexist?
  - From: Jefferson Davis <jdavis@standard.k12.ca.us>
- Re: strategy for getting groupOfNames (AD) and posixAccount (Unix) to coexist?
  - From: Dieter KlÃnter <dieter@dkluenter.de>
- Re: strategy for getting groupOfNames (AD) and posixAccount (Unix) to coexist?
  - From: Philip Colmer <philip.colmer@linaro.org>

Prev by Date: dynlist groups not usable in ACLs?
Next by Date: Re: Re: strategy for getting groupOfNames (AD) and posixAccount (Unix) to coexist?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread