[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Q: monitoring attributes

Am Wed, 27 Nov 2013 09:09:35 +0100
schrieb "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>:

> Hi!
> I found out why I never was successful with cn=monitor: By default
> '*' attributes show almost nothing; you'll have to use '+' attributes
> (in my version at least). I'm not very happy with the decision,
> because you'll get the truely operational attributes also. If the
> whole subtree cn=Monitor is invisible in naming contexts, I see
> little reason to hide the "normal" attributes as operational in the
> whole subtree.

> The other thing is that I'm not too happy with are spaces in RDNs,
> like " cn=Connection 2111,cn=Connections,cn=Monitor", or "cn=Database
> 2,cn=Databases,cn=Monitor". I'd prefer are more common pattern for
> IDs like "Connection-2111" or "Connection_2111".

In fact spaces in a commonName attribute value are in accordance with
X.520 practice.


Dieter KlÃnter | Systemberatung
GPG Key ID:DA147B05