[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Q: "opjectClass: top" or not?

To: <openldap-technical@openldap.org>
Subject: Q: "opjectClass: top" or not?
From: "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:09:44 +0100
Content-disposition: inline

Hi!

Sorry, this is a somewhat generic question: I wonder what difference it makes whether I specify "objectClass: top" for an object, or not: Conceptually, "top" is included automatically (so the objectClass attribute goes to any structural class), but when I fetch an object, I never see the "top" objectClass. Explicitly specifying "objectClass: top" makes every object a few bytes larger. So is there any reason to explicitly specify "objectClass: top"?

Regards,
Ulrich

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Q: "opjectClass: top" or not?
  - From: Christian Kratzer <ck-lists@cksoft.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Openldap for proxy AD
Next by Date: Re: Openldap for proxy AD
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread