[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Antw: Re: Log service time?



On Sep 6, 2013, at 14:05, ÐÐÐÐÑÐÐÐÐÐÐ ÐÐÑÑÐÐ <casper@meteor.dp.ua> wrote:

> Ð ÐÑÐ, 06/09/2013 Ð 04:42 -0700, Howard Chu ÐÐÑÐÑ:
>> It is Project policy to only investigate issues in the current release. There 
>> is no sense in tracing back thru old code whose bugs have already been fixed.
> 
> This means old versions are not supported and makes problems with
> openldap distribution packages as distributions don't update upstream
> versions inside distribution version. :(
> 
> For Debian that means staying with bugs for >2 years. It's hard to call
> this policy "right".

You're complaining in the wrong place. How about complaining about the <insert your favorite Linux distribution here> policy to not track the OpenLDAP releases closely? 

You seem to think if a Linux distribution releases a certain old OpenLDAP version then it's the OpenLDAP maintainers' job to support that version as long as the distribution ships it. That's pretty unfair to the OpenLDAP maintainers. They had no say in the distribution's decision to ship the old version. Think about it.

jens


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail