[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: mdb fixes for 2.4.35?

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:00 PM +0200 Michael StrÃder
> <michael@stroeder.com> wrote:
>> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>>> --On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 9:31 PM +0200 Patrick Lists
>>> <openldap-list@puzzled.xs4all.nl> wrote:
>>>> Thanks Quanah. I saw that the ITS7604.patch is already in openldap.git
>>>> HEAD. This also seems to apply to the changes in your
>>>> openldap-2.4.35.tgz tarball. Is it the same as openldap.git HEAD?
>>> The ITS7604 patch is the same as what is in git HEAD, yes.  I generated
>>> it using git. ;)
>> Looking at git it's also already in the RE24 branch.
>> So why not just refer to RE24 branch?
> Because RE24 has some in-development code for mdb that is still being worked
> on, whereas what I posted is frozen at a point from before that new
> development started, but includes the fixes made to mdb to stabilize it.
> I.e., what I posted is stable.  What is currently in RE24 is not.

Given your RE24 testing call:
Is RE24 now considered as stable as the custom openldap-2.4.35.tgz tarball you
referred to?

Ciao, Michael.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature