Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > --On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:00 PM +0200 Michael StrÃder > <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > >> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: >>> --On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 9:31 PM +0200 Patrick Lists >>> <email@example.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Quanah. I saw that the ITS7604.patch is already in openldap.git >>>> HEAD. This also seems to apply to the changes in your >>>> openldap-2.4.35.tgz tarball. Is it the same as openldap.git HEAD? >>> >>> The ITS7604 patch is the same as what is in git HEAD, yes. I generated >>> it using git. ;) >> >> Looking at git it's also already in the RE24 branch. >> >> So why not just refer to RE24 branch? > > Because RE24 has some in-development code for mdb that is still being worked > on, whereas what I posted is frozen at a point from before that new > development started, but includes the fixes made to mdb to stabilize it. > > I.e., what I posted is stable. What is currently in RE24 is not. Given your RE24 testing call: Is RE24 now considered as stable as the custom openldap-2.4.35.tgz tarball you referred to? Ciao, Michael.
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature