[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Performance of MDB and BDB Please suggest?

To: Guillaume Rousse <guillomovitch@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Performance of MDB and BDB Please suggest?
From: aryan rawat <aryanrawat24@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:52:43 +0530
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Ecq5mLD/K9eInQQOZj/0aJv5JYXc+ev/KK8ESIXCto4=; b=MlTg6qkDm3TGojWuK9b88a8P56FrauWtYFlQrfr86G6M3DdIYlDrb3oV0h0dC5kFTZ n64tzxxkoqsN+Qsf6lgIOUsg8PswrHLEy4Qnnr38oL3teUroju6tCbdKBpkjJliBFWZd HChPK5gH0wHTmlni+AzHJYStM5dBl7hHYSdT9lUeH3PJacwE3sRK4Lv2FmVudg2jgyjW 3Rj8gXXT7baBsuW6YGwG5fU3+8E5jxKUASZphFE34bq6CMfUMK5K/R+wqCA5aJKsJhIJ +N+ZosLgmrhQ+lgRVB5cq8mC6F9BJidAZaOG0oPiN2HY8kxwObKzqh7HLqjBQbDLDvVw +FSA==
In-reply-to: <503733D0.2040904@gmail.com>
References: <CAL_jkvvJxfJ6vGwbVQetu1HdVRLtU0JA32T==Dp3d-7RGf1tqw@mail.gmail.com> <503733D0.2040904@gmail.com>

Hi Gillaume,

I am agree with you still the difference is too much that was the only concern for me.

BR's,

Haroon

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Guillaume Rousse <guillomovitch@gmail.com> wrote:

Le 24/08/2012 06:53, aryan rawat a écrit :

*The outcome was BDB was almost 8 time faster than MDB. *
For two different versions of OpenLDAP, meaning also two different builds. How can you conclude anything from this kind of settings ?

--
BOFH excuse #340:

Well fix that in the next (upgrade, update, patch release, service pack).

References:
- Performance of MDB and BDB Please suggest?
  - From: aryan rawat <aryanrawat24@gmail.com>
- Re: Performance of MDB and BDB Please suggest?
  - From: Guillaume Rousse <guillomovitch@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: compiled the Openldap 2.4.32 with these setting are they the Best..
Next by Date: Re: slapd-meta doesn't continue with multiple uri's
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread