[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: DEL don't get synced

To: Buchan Milne <bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net>
Subject: Re: DEL don't get synced
From: Marc Patermann <hans.moser@ofd-z.niedersachsen.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:41:40 +0100
Cc: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>, openldap-technical@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <201202211238.51702.bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net>
References: <4F27C7AC.1040308@ofd-z.niedersachsen.de> <4F27EB21.9000501@symas.com> <4F436302.4020601@ofd-z.niedersachsen.de> <201202211238.51702.bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)

Buchan,

Buchan Milne schrieb (21.02.2012 11:38 Uhr):

As far as I have read in changelogs and ITS, anything fromOPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4 (including 2.4.29) before:


commit 10c81e2a46c9b603ba1dfcf53422573d5068ba04
Author: Howard Chu <hyc@openldap.org>
Date:   Sun Feb 12 21:07:25 2012 -0800

    ITS#7162 Revert "ITS#7052 ignore Adds with too old entryCSN"

    This reverts commit ba4366eae098c0e4950a78b1da8d79ffe8b34fee.
    The patch caused a regression (ITS#7162).


will probably still be broken.

Thank you. But what does this mean to me exactly?
What is the best to try now?


Marc

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DEL don't get synced
  - From: Buchan Milne <bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net>

References:
- Re: DEL don't get synced
  - From: Marc Patermann <hans.moser@ofd-z.niedersachsen.de>
- Re: DEL don't get synced
  - From: Buchan Milne <bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net>

Prev by Date: Re: DEL don't get synced
Next by Date: Re: DEL don't get synced
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread