Re: idle_timelimit - idletimeout - nscd

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Subject: Re: idle_timelimit - idletimeout - nscd
From: Thierry Lacoste <lacoste@u-pec.fr>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:13:11 +0100
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <8EF5F12DE131C9F9E496C2A5@[192.168.1.2]>
References: <1297894853.27692.1421057727@webmail.messagingengine.com> <8EF5F12DE131C9F9E496C2A5@[192.168.1.2]>


On 16 févr. 11, at 23:38, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:

--On Wednesday, February 16, 2011 3:20 PM -0700 ldap@mm.st wrote:

We currently do not use ncsd on the clients, but are considering itif
that makes a difference in the above settings.


(a) Don't use nscd, use something modern that is functional

Can you please provide examples of good alternatives to nscd?

Regards,
Thierry

Follow-Ups:
- Re: idle_timelimit - idletimeout - nscd
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

References:
- idle_timelimit - idletimeout - nscd
  - From: ldap@mm.st
- Re: idle_timelimit - idletimeout - nscd
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>