[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Transparent proxy, (objectClass=user) not being relayed. Schema issue?

Thanks p.!

I've compiled and tested with the latest from HEAD. Both back-ldap and back-meta work in a transparent proxy configuration as expected, without the need for extra AD schema definitions.


On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:55 PM, <masarati@aero.polimi.it> wrote:
>> 2.3.43 included with CentOS. I'll try the latest package. Thanks!
> Ah.  Actually, I only tried an undefined objectClass, which works.  In
> fact, in the case you're considering, (objectClass=user) contains an
> invalid value of a valid attribute, while (sAMAccountName=user01) contains
> an invalid attribute, so the two cases are different.  Right now, with
> HEAD's back-meta for "(&(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=user01))" I get
> "(&(?objectClass=user)(!(objectClass=*)))".  Let me check a bit more.

I have provided another round of fixes.  One of them affects back-meta
(map.c, ITS#6818); another affects filter handling (ava.c); finally,
another affects slapo-rwm when used in conjunction with back-ldap
(rwmmap.c).  Now the issue should be definitely fixed.  Please test.