Michael Ströder wrote:
MS> IIRC the original poster wanted to use multi-master
MS> replication (MMR). So given the various MMR-related
MS> fixes *after* 2.4.11 it's wrong to point him to a
MS> 2.4.11 build because he might raise issues here which
MS> are already solved.
OK. I didn't read the whole thread. I saw someone wanting to install
2.4.11 on RHEL/CentOS, which we have reasonably well-tested packages for.
I entirely agree that new deployments should use not earlier than the
latest stable release, and MMR especially so.
We don't currently have 2.4.16 for RHEL, but someone will.