[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: sync replicate glued database [auf Viren überprüft]

To: openldap-software@openldap.org
Subject: Re: sync replicate glued database [auf Viren überprüft]
From: Andreas Hasenack <ahasenack@terra.com.br>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:45:00 -0300
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <4678F07F.3000402@ofd-sth.niedersachsen.de>
References: <4677A3CA.6000009@ofd-sth.niedersachsen.de> <200706192241.24766.bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net> <4678F07F.3000402@ofd-sth.niedersachsen.de>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06)

On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:16:47AM +0200, Hans Moser wrote:
>  Buchan Milne schrieb:
> 
>  > To put the overlay into the database context does not make any
>  > difference.
>  It seems, I was wrong. Sorry.
>  After I made a new change to one entry on the master and waited a bit 
>  longer, the changes were replicated to the consumer.

In the long run this replication won't work with openldap 2.3.x. See
ITS#4626. You need to use one replication for each database, ignoring
the glue at the provider.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: sync replicate glued database [auf Viren überprüft]
  - From: Hans Moser <hans.moser@ofd-sth.niedersachsen.de>

References:
- sync replicate glued database
  - From: Hans Moser <hans.moser@ofd-sth.niedersachsen.de>
- Re: sync replicate glued database
  - From: Buchan Milne <bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net>
- Re: sync replicate glued database [auf Viren überprüft]
  - From: Hans Moser <hans.moser@ofd-sth.niedersachsen.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Recovery after system shutdown
Next by Date: Re: Proxy Authz interoperability of Sun's JNDI LDAP boost pack and OpenLDAP
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread