[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: strange behaviour of syncrepl

I was deleting the entire directory nodes, and got confirm that the consumer
side will not be emptyed after this operation. Deleting a single node does
not cause problem.


Thanks for your help.
                      Tommy

On 9/25/06, Aaron Richton < richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu> wrote: 

Since 2.3.24, there's:

        Fixed slapo-syncprov incomplete sync on restart issues (ITS#4622)
        Fixed slapd syncrepl no rootdn bug (ITS#4582)
        Fixed slapd syncrepl contextCSN issue (ITS#4622)
        Fixed slapo-syncprov need new CSN with delete syncID sets
(ITS#4534)
        Fixed slapo-syncprov startup when lastmod is off (ITS#4613)
        Fixed slapo-syncprov DEL propagation bug (ITS#4589)

4589/4534 are particularly delicate for deletes and syncrepl. Now, if
you're running CDS, you should probably contact Symas. I can assure you
there are people there with perfect awareness of these bugs.

"sync" is a debugging level for slapd, see
http://www.openldap.org/doc/admin23/slapdconf2.html. You can configure
them with "-d" at the command line, "loglevel" in slapd.conf, or
"olcLogLevel" in back-config.

On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, thriller yan wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm running symas cds based on OpenLDAP: slapd 2.3.24. Our work requires
us
> to stick on this version.
> Please see attachment for level 4 'heavy trace debugging' log, I don't
see
> much hints from the log.
> I deleted one leaf in provider side, but this does not happen on the
> consumer side after syncrepl.
>
> BTW:what is the "sync" loglevel? Could you pls point me to the syncrepl
bug
> URL?
>
> Thanks very much.
>                     Tommy
>
>
> On 9/25/06, Aaron Richton < richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, thriller yan wrote:
>>
>> > Basically, when I add some nodes in the provider side, these nodes
are
>> > replicated to the consumer side, but when I delete some nodes in the
>> > provider side, the consumer side remain untouched. This confuse me.
>>
>> For quite a while, this confused me too. It turns out there were some
>> syncrepl bugs, tracked down by this point. Are you running 2.3.27?
>> Upgrade if not, and observe closely. Turn on "sync" loglevel.
>>
>