[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Replication oddity in 2.3.19

On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Kevin Spicer wrote:

> > I should point out that there are several suffixes handled by the one 
> > server.  And the first suffix (not this), with an identical 
> > configuration except for rid= etc, replicates OK...
> Are these seperate suffixes or are they glued together with 
> 'subordinate'.  I've had some issues with syncrepl & glue (see ITS#4323)

Individual suffixes, which are also joined together with back-meta to form 
a "view" of all suffixes; however, the point is that except for the first 
physical suffix, any changes are not propagated until that entry is again 
retrieved.  Really weird...

Dave Horsfall  DTM  VK2KFU  daveh@ci.com.au  Ph: +61 2 9552-5509 (d) -5500 (sw)
Corinthian Engineering P/L,  54/19-21 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont, NSW 2009,  Australia