[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: ACI?
Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
Pierangelo Masarati writes:
Ted Kaczmarek wrote:
Is openldap with aci enabled still considered development?
(...) In 2.3, some effort is being put in determining if they
suffer from deadlocking, and apparently they don't; I cannot say the
same for erlier releases because no such testing has been done
consistently, AFAIK.
I thought that was 'access ... by set='. It's 'by aci' too?
Anything that can touch multiple entries while evaluating a single
access check has the potential to cause a deadlock. Since ACIs residing
in one entry can refer to groups, sets, and other entries, then the
potential for a problem exists. We haven't done enough testing /
investigation to state with certainty that there is no problem.
--
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. Director, Highland Sun
http://www.symas.com http://highlandsun.com/hyc
Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support
- References:
- ACI?
- From: Ted Kaczmarek <tedkaz@optonline.net>
- Re: ACI?
- From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>
- Re: ACI?
- From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>