Re: proxy-cache

[Remco Post <r.post@sara.nl>]

Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
>
> > I think I've spotted the problem.  For some reason I can't remember 
> > (nor explain at the moment) I removed that part of the condition for 
> > ldap_entry_objclasses.  I'm considering the opportunity to put it 
> > back, since it largely reduces the amount of candidates selected when 
> > filtering for an "auxiliary" objectClass and, at the moment, I don't 
> > see any drawback.
>
>
> I've found the reason: that part was removed because it would have 
> conflicted with composite filters; your problem should now be fixed in 
> HEAD (please confirm).

Thanks, just checked a new HEAD out, it is again as fast as things used 
to be.

> p.
>
>
>
>
>    SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497


--
Met vriendelijke groeten,

Remco Post

SARA - Reken- en Netwerkdiensten                      http://www.sara.nl
High Performance Computing  Tel. +31 20 592 3000    Fax. +31 20 668 3167

"I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the
computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the
computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to
end." -- Douglas Adams