[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re[2]: filter="(?=undefined)"

To: OpenLDAP Software List <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re[2]: filter="(?=undefined)"
From: pemabontech <pemabontech@free.fr>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:34:14 +0200
In-reply-to: <C28F090F9F709D64EF1EEE78@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu>
Organization: PEM
References: <694497920.20040819173555@free.fr> <C28F090F9F709D64EF1EEE78@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu>

That's good. I found the problem.
My attribute had an error in the schema definition.

It's : ORDERING caseIgnoreOrderingMatch

and not ORDERING caseIgnoreMatch



Thanks


QGM> --On Thursday, August 19, 2004 5:35 PM +0200 pemabontech 
QGM> <pemabontech@free.fr> wrote:

>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I have a OpenLDAP 2.2.13 on a Linux Debian.
>>
>> All my search with the >= operator failed.
>> The log says : filter="(?=undefined)"
>>
>> My search with = is good.
>>
>>
>> Any ideas !!

QGM> In searching via google, I see that to do an inequality match, there must
QGM> be an ORDERING definition in the schema for that attribute. Does your
QGM> attribute have that in its schema definition?

QGM> --Quanah

QGM> --
QGM> Quanah Gibson-Mount
QGM> Principal Software Developer
QGM> ITSS/Shared Services
QGM> Stanford University
QGM> GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html



-- 
Cordialement,
 pemabontech                            mailto:pemabontech@free.fr

References:
- filter="(?=undefined)"
  - From: pemabontech <pemabontech@free.fr>
- Re: filter="(?=undefined)"
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: OpenLDAP with back-sql
Next by Date: ldap address book not browseable by Outlook
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread