[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: start_tls versus ldaps

To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: start_tls versus ldaps
From: Dieter Kluenter <dieter@dkluenter.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:09:09 +0200
In-reply-to: <200408130830.11028.igonzalez@becarios.ulpgc.es> ( Imobach González Sosa's message of "Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:30:10 +0100")
References: <200408121124.41942.igonzalez@becarios.ulpgc.es> <04c001c48065$aedfc7d0$160110ac@marco> <200408130830.11028.igonzalez@becarios.ulpgc.es>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux)

Imobach González Sosa <igonzalez@becarios.ulpgc.es> writes:

> First, thanks ViSolve and Axel for your replies.
[...]
> Ok, I see. But if I wanna "force" encrypted sessions, can I do it using TLS? 
> I've "googled" and I've seen some references, but nothing clear at all.

See the TLS_REQCERT options in man ldap.conf(5), and TLSVerfyClient
options in man slapd.conf(5), furthermore topic security factors TLS in
man slapd.conf(5)

-Dieter

-- 
Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung
Tel.: +49.40.64861967
Fax : +49.40.64891521
http://www.avci.de

References:
- start_tls versus ldaps
  - From: Imobach González Sosa <igonzalez@becarios.ulpgc.es>
- Re: start_tls versus ldaps
  - From: Imobach González Sosa <igonzalez@becarios.ulpgc.es>

Prev by Date: Re: start_tls versus ldaps
Next by Date: Re: start_tls versus ldaps
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread