[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: 2.1.17 performance issues

To: xoror@infuse.org
Subject: Re: 2.1.17 performance issues
From: Andreas <andreas@conectiva.com.br>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:26:51 -0300
Cc: Howard Chu <hyc@highlandsun.com>, "'John Madden'" <jmadden@ivytech.edu>, quanah@stanford.edu, openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304170103120.22780-100000@loki>
References: <004201c3045f$b97c4840$6450a8c0@CELLO> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304170103120.22780-100000@loki>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 01:11:10AM +0200, xoror@infuse.org wrote:
> I've now set the cachesize to 300MB and reimported all the data, The 
> performance is now good. (still ldbm is twice as fast as back-bdb.) i've 

What is your performance now?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.1.17 performance issues
  - From: xoror@infuse.org

References:
- RE: 2.1.17 performance issues
  - From: "Howard Chu" <hyc@highlandsun.com>
- RE: 2.1.17 performance issues
  - From: xoror@infuse.org

Prev by Date: smbldap-tools: Object class violation
Next by Date: Re: 2.1.17 performance issues
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread