> From: "Alan Sparks" <asparks@doublesparks.net> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:58:51 -0700 (MST) > > > Chris Garrigues said: > > [snip] > > 2.0.x openldaps and every time I've tried, it's worked fine on my test > > server, but when I tried to install on my production box, it's gone > > into the weeds and caused problems for days while I failed to diagnose > > the problem. It's frustrating because I can't make it fail on my test > [/snip] > > My usual tendency in these circumstances is to start looking for > differences between the two boxes, esp. versions of libraries etc. > installed. The two boxes are both installed with the *exact* same set of RPMs. The only difference that I've identified so far the the afore mentioned samba domain clients. > [snip] > > I'm completely stable with GDBM. > [/snip] > > Well, that's a Good Thing. :-) Yeah, that's why I'm not panicking. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com 716 Congress, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78701 +1 512 374 0500 Without some consensus on what *should* happen, all that remains is a desert of unfufilled expectations cross dressing as "bugs". --- Jeff Johnson <jbj@redhat.com>
Attachment:
pgpAp5E4kD48A.pgp
Description: PGP signature