[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ldaps://

To: marc.bigler@day.com
Subject: Re: ldaps://
From: Tony Earnshaw <tonni@billy.demon.nl>
Date: 16 Oct 2002 20:13:53 +0200
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <OFA288F3AC.B92F414F-ONC1256C54.0037AC52@day.com>
References: <OFA288F3AC.B92F414F-ONC1256C54.0037AC52@day.com>

ons, 2002-10-16 kl. 12:11 skrev marc.bigler@day.com:

> So ldaps:// (using port 636) is deprecated and shouldn't be used anymore
> correct ? The new way is to go with TLS which will anyway run via ldap://
> (port 389) ?

Perhaps you could give the FAQ reference. As far as I understand it, all
the SSL/TLS communication directed to ldaps (/etc/services) still goes
over 636, though the SLS/TLS protocol can be enabled on any port
whatsoever. Like 9009, for example.

Best,

Tony

-- 

Tony Earnshaw

"There are many people who can't face the truth ... If you rob a
normal person of life's lies, at the same time you'll be robbing
him of his happiness."

>From Henrik Ibsen's "Vildanden", "The wild Duck."

e-post:		tonni@billy.demon.nl
www:		http://www.billy.demon.nl

References:
- ldaps://
  - From: marc.bigler@day.com

Prev by Date: Re: ldaps://
Next by Date: Re: Slow bind on Intel PC with dual NICs
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread