[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ITS#8286 continued



Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> I found a few stray items that still need matching rules.  All were trivially straight forward except one for slapo-chain:
> 
>    { "chain-chaining", "args",
>        2, 4, 0, ARG_MAGIC|ARG_BERVAL|CH_CHAINING, chain_cf_gen,
>        "( OLcfgOvAt:3.1 NAME 'olcChainingBehavior' "
>            "DESC 'Chaining behavior control parameters (draft-sermersheim-ldap-chaining)' "
>            "SYNTAX OMsDirectoryString SINGLE-VALUE )", NULL, NULL },
> 
> At the moment, based on the man page description, I was thinking:
> 
>           "EQUALITY caseExactMatch "
> 
> for the matching rule.  Anyone have an opinion for caseIgnoreMatch being better?

Looks like the values are schema keywords, they should be caseIgnoreMatch.
> 
> Thanks,
> Quanah
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Product Architect
> Symas Corporation
> Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:
> <http://www.symas.com>
> 
> 
> 


-- 
  -- Howard Chu
  CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/