[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: RE24 testing call #2 (2.4.26)

To: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
Subject: Re: RE24 testing call #2 (2.4.26)
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 04:56:39 -0700
Cc: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>, openldap-devel@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <alpine.SOC.2.00.1106230730460.9254@toolbox.rutgers.edu>
References: <684E3E503A168BD462502793@[192.168.1.2]> <alpine.SOC.2.00.1106230730460.9254@toolbox.rutgers.edu>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0a1) Gecko/20110612 Firefox/7.0a1 SeaMonkey/2.4a1

Aaron Richton wrote:

ITS # 6979 (should be a quick one)...

??? test062 is not part of RE24. You might have found a legitimate bug, butfiling it against RE24 was wrong, and there's no reason to delay 2.4.26 for this.


--
  -- Howard Chu
  CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RE24 testing call #2 (2.4.26)
  - From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>

References:
- RE24 testing call #2 (2.4.26)
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Re: RE24 testing call #2 (2.4.26)
  - From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: RE24 testing call #2 (2.4.26)
Next by Date: Re: RE24 testing call #2 (2.4.26)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread