[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: More items for RE24

To: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Subject: Re: More items for RE24
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:24:56 -0800
Cc: openldap-devel@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <hbf.20110118gfzj@bombur.uio.no>
References: <hbf.20110118gfzj@bombur.uio.no>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0b8pre) Gecko/20101024 Firefox/4.0b8pre SeaMonkey/2.1b2pre

Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:

ITS#6760 is in RE24, though I never marked it Test.  Did someone review
it as requested in the ITS?

Yes, I looked it over. The only reason to use overlay_entry_release_ov() isbecause you know for certain that the entry was created by something lower onthe overlay stack and that upper overlays don't need to be run. It just savessome shuffling of op->o_bd etc. in the caller. Your use ofbe_entry_release_r() is fine. I didn't realize the ITS hadn't been set to Testyet, but it's fine as Release now.


--
  -- Howard Chu
  CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/

References:
- More items for RE24
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>

Prev by Date: More items for RE24
Next by Date: Re: More items for RE24
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread