[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Fwd: RE24 testing

To: openldap-devel@openldap.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: RE24 testing
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:03:11 -0700
In-reply-to: <48DB0639.5030602@symas.com>
References: <4BE118E4A46213877834BF20@192.168.1.199> <e021c7c00809241735m4a59ff4ao5127a589668506@mail.gmail.com> <e021c7c00809241753h5fb3ca45t707165eea9f6f1b7@mail.gmail.com> <48DB0639.5030602@symas.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; rv:1.9.1b1pre) Gecko/20080917130338 SeaMonkey/2.0a1pre

Howard Chu wrote:

There's not much difference between HEAD and RE24 really. And I've seen
test050 fail on both, at random times. Still haven't tracked it down.

Hm. I just saw test050 lock up on me, a repeat of the discussion in ITS#5454. Seems like we need to go back to a trylock here.

--
  -- Howard Chu
  CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fwd: RE24 testing
  - From: Rein Tollevik <rein@OpenLDAP.org>

References:
- Fwd: RE24 testing
  - From: "Brett @Google" <brett.maxfield@gmail.com>
- Re: Fwd: RE24 testing
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Fwd: RE24 testing
Next by Date: Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd/back-bdb add.c back-bdb.h bind.c cache.c compare.c config.c delete.c dn2entry.c dn2id.c filterindex.c id2entry.c idl.c init.c key.c modify.c modrdn.c proto-bdb.h referral.c search.c tools.c
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread