Re: Playing with MMR in HEAD

["Gavin Henry" <ghenry@suretecsystems.com>]

Also,

With the 3 running slapd instances now, switching a drink attribute caused
a crash on the con2:

lt-slapd: encode.c:346: ber_put_ostring: Assertion `str != ((void *)0)'
failed.
Aborted

I'll collect more complete debugging info as I continue.

Thanks.

-- 
Kind Regards,

Gavin Henry.
Managing Director.

T +44 (0) 1224 279484
M +44 (0) 7930 323266
F +44 (0) 1224 824887
E ghenry@suretecsystems.com

Open Source. Open Solutions(tm).

http://www.suretecsystems.com/

<quote who="Gavin Henry">
> Hi All,
>
> I'm playing with test050, i.e. running it, copying con directory to con2
> and then starting the original provider and consumer up. Then starting up
> con2 on ldap://:9013/
>
> All fine, then I go about adding a new syncrepl on cn=config and
> dc=example,dc=com pointing to ldap://:9013/
>
> I'm not using LDIF, just messing with JXplorer.
>
> Everything worked ok, with a couple of crashes at the point I added a new
> syncrepl on con2 point to itself.
>
> Both pro and con died with:
>
> lt-slapd: attr.c:481: attr_merge: Assertion `( nvals == ((void *)0) &&
> (*a)->a_nvals == (*a)->a_vals ) || ( nvals != ((void *)0) && ( (
> (*a)->a_vals == ((void *)0) && (*a)->a_nvals == ((void *)0) ) || (
> (*a)->a_nvals != (*a)->a_vals ) ) )' failed.
> Aborted
>
> I guess I should pay attention more to the order in test050 and timing.
>
> Lastly, how do we define test050 to be a multimaster test when there are
> only two instances of slapd?
>
> Is it because we have 2 sycnrepl on cn=config and then another two on the
> bdb backends? I thought a test for this would include at least 3 running
> slapd instances?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gavin.
>
> --
> Kind Regards,
>
> Gavin Henry.
> Managing Director.
>
> T +44 (0) 1224 279484
> M +44 (0) 7930 323266
> F +44 (0) 1224 824887
> E ghenry@suretecsystems.com
>
> Open Source. Open Solutions(tm).
>
> http://www.suretecsystems.com/
>
>
>