[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [PATCH] Status of Connectionless LDAP (cldap)

To: openldap-devel@openldap.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Status of Connectionless LDAP (cldap)
From: Michael B Allen <mba2000@ioplex.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:48:57 -0400
In-reply-to: <BE26AF8747C05ED752B7B9B5@[192.168.1.3]>
Organization: IOPLEX Software
References: <20070530184211.2606b52d.mba2000@ioplex.com> <20070530211459.9b213723.mba2000@ioplex.com> <20070530220055.5d69465a.mba2000@ioplex.com> <BE26AF8747C05ED752B7B9B5@[192.168.1.3]>

On Wed, 30 May 2007 19:44:16 -0700
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com> wrote:

> --On Wednesday, May 30, 2007 10:00 PM -0400 Michael B Allen 
> <mba2000@ioplex.com> wrote:
> 
> > Well that was a breeze.
> >
> > The attached patch fixes the following assertion when trying to use
> > cldap functionality:
> >
> > io.c:81: ber_write: Assertion `buf != ((void *)0)' failed.
> 
> Patches should be submitted via the ITS process.

Hi Quanah,

Ok, will do.

But the cldap code still isn't right. The transport layer doesn't retry
or timeout. It also hangs if there's no response. I'll look into that but
the query I'm doing works over TCP too so I'm thinking about just going
with that for now. UDP would be nice for determining if servers are alive.

Mike

References:
- Status of Connectionless LDAP (cldap)
  - From: Michael B Allen <mba2000@ioplex.com>
- Re: Status of Connectionless LDAP (cldap)
  - From: Michael B Allen <mba2000@ioplex.com>
- Re: [PATCH] Status of Connectionless LDAP (cldap)
  - From: Michael B Allen <mba2000@ioplex.com>
- Re: [PATCH] Status of Connectionless LDAP (cldap)
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Status of Connectionless LDAP (cldap)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread