* Andreas (andreas@conectiva.com.br) wrote: > libldap.so (devel library) is a link to > libldap.so.2.2 (the soname) which is a link to > libldap.so.2.2.7 > > I realize openldap is not linux specific, so the above may not apply directly, > it's just a suggestion. On Linux you can just use symbol versioning and have just a 'libldap.so.2'. Many of these problems are because of ancient unixes that don't support things the modern world has come to realize are necessary to reasonably maintain a system. > You are, of course, free to call it whatever you want, I'll just follow > whatever comes from upstream. But since you asked for comments... ;) As I understand it the problem here is quite simple- libtool sucks and is busted and can't handle that. If libtool could handle it that'd certainly be nicer. Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature