[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ITS#2494, ldap_sort_entries

To: "Howard Chu" <hyc@highlandsun.com>
Subject: Re: ITS#2494, ldap_sort_entries
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 20:24:35 -0800
Cc: <openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <00c601c3bc73$ee4de890$1801a8c0@CELLO>
References: <00c601c3bc73$ee4de890$1801a8c0@CELLO>

At 07:40 PM 12/6/2003, Howard Chu wrote:
>So, any thoughts on what to do with this?  What should you expect when you
>have entries and non-entries interleaved in a result?

Well, in reading your response, it seems like the problem is that
ldap_sort_entries() is not ignoring non-entries.  That should be
fixed.   Guess non-entries should just end up at the end of the
chain.

>  -- Howard Chu
>  Chief Architect, Symas Corp.       Director, Highland Sun
>  http://www.symas.com               http://highlandsun.com/hyc
>  Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support

References:
- ITS#2494, ldap_sort_entries
  - From: "Howard Chu" <hyc@highlandsun.com>

Prev by Date: ITS#2494, ldap_sort_entries
Next by Date: proxyAuthz propagation in back-ldap
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread