[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: HEADS UP: BerkeleyDB 4.2, libldif, etc.

Howard Chu writes:
> Why don't we move libldbm into back-ldbm, while we're at it? It really
> has no purpose of its own.

That reminds me:

  ./configure --enable-bdb --enable-ldbm --with-ldbm-api=gdbm

fails with:

  configure: error: LDBM API not compatible with BDB

Is that beacuse back-bdb used libldbm once?  If so, configure need not
forbid this now.