Re: Failure in decoding filter

[Pierangelo Masarati <masarati@aero.polimi.it>]

"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
> 
> At 07:48 AM 2002-02-14, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> >At 07:40 AM 2002-02-14, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> >>At 07:02 AM 2002-02-14, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> >>>  0000:  a4 16 04 02 63 6e 30 10  80 01 61 82 02 64 6f 82
> >>>  0010:  01 04 82 01 04 82 01 21  30 00
> >
> >My built in parser is goofy, too.
> 
> Especially when it hasn't been feed enough cold carbonated
> caffeine.
> 
> My initial analysis was correct...  The substrings set is:
> 
> >30 10    80 01 61 82 02 64 6f 82 01 04 82 01 04 82 01 21
> 
> That's obviously hosed.

The point is: why is it hosed? And how can it change if debug
is enabled (only TRACE (==0x1) makes it work correctly)?

It looks like it is in ber_* encoding/io stuff, because 
filter parsing/putting has very very little debug code in.
I really don't know where to start looking...

Ando

-- 
Dr. Pierangelo Masarati               | voice: +39 02 2399 8309
Dip. Ing. Aerospaziale                | fax:   +39 02 2399 8334
Politecnico di Milano                 |
mailto:pierangelo.masarati@polimi.it
via La Masa 34, 20156 Milano, Italy   |
http://www.aero.polimi.it/~masarati