extensible object

["Fu, Jing" <jing_fu@atlanta.stercomm.com>]

I posted the message to the general mailing list a week ago and got no
replies.  So I re-post it here:
----------------------------
> I understand that it's a bad practice to use extensibleObject since it
> defeats schema constraints.  So, why is it included in the LDAP
> specification at all?  When does it make sense?  Any real-life example?
> 
> Also, does any LDAP server has a provision for the admin to disable
> extensibleObject so the class cannot be added to any objects?
> 
> thanks,
> Jing
>