[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#8054) Operation duration logging
2015-02-11 18:33 GMT+01:00 <email@example.com>:
> On 11. feb. 2015 12:38, Michael Str=C3=B6der wrote:
>> firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>>> Cool feture, but please use fewer characteres in the already
>>> bloated log. How about "time=3D<integer>us" or even omit the "us"?
>> But 'time' sounds a bit general.
>> How about 'tdu' or even 'td' as abbreviation for "time duration"?
> I don't think so. You can't see from that what it means unless you
> already know, so you have to look it up just to see if you're
> interested. 'time' you can decide to look up if you are interested.
Seems other LDAP servers have choosen 'etime' (see
not try to use the same word?