Subject
| From
| # of followups
|
|---|
| larger stock returns
| Nora Westbrook
| 0
|
| ietf.org mailing list memberships reminder
| mailman-owner
| 0
|
| ietf.org mailing list memberships reminder
| mailman-owner
| 0
|
| cardiology, radiology,
| Regina Cornett
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] draft-pauzies-ldap-schema-nonascii-mr-00.txt
| Alexandre PAUZIES
| 2
|
| Re: [ldapext] draft-pauzies-ldap-schema-nonascii-mr-00.txt
| Steven Legg
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] draft-pauzies-ldap-schema-nonascii-mr-00.txt
| Hallvard B Furuseth
| 0
|
| doctors,physicians,& American doctors directoty
| Suzette Poe
| 0
|
| FW: Mórtgage Application
| Jaime Dempsey
| 0
|
| The Results of Your Survey
| Shelby Cohen
| 0
|
| [ldapext] draft-ietf-ldapext-ldap-java-api-19.txt
| Steve Sonntag
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] draft-ietf-ldapext-ldap-java-api-19.txt
| Steve Sonntag
| 0
|
| 2004 doctors American directoty,physicians,
| Suzanne Oneal
| 0
|
| [ldapext] LDIFv2
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 1
|
| PLEASE ASSIST TRANSFER.
| o_kenneth
| 0
|
| [ldapext] subtree search with glue entries
| Jim Sermersheim
| 1
|
| Re: [ldapext] subtree search with glue entries
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] subtree search with glue entries
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] subtree search with glue entries
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] subtree search with glue entries
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| [ldapext] RE: [XEDDEV] LDIFv2
| Andrew Sciberras
| 0
|
| Status: Approved
| Deanna Street
| 0
|
| [ldapext] New I-D: 'untypedObject' object class
| Hallvard B Furuseth
| 1
|
| Re: [ldapext] New I-D: 'untypedObject' object class
| John McMeeking
| 1
|
| Re: [ldapext] New I-D: 'untypedObject' object class
| Hallvard B Furuseth
| 1
|
| Re: [ldapext] New I-D: 'untypedObject' object class
| John McMeeking
| 0
|
| [ldapext] exclusions versus alreadySearched
| Jim Sermersheim
| 1
|
| Application Form Accepted
| Carolyn Burke
| 0
|
| university degrees for sale here
| Leticia Macdonald
| 0
|
| Re: kong diagnostic
| Dannie
| 0
|
| Your confirm code is: #M854
| Angelo Stevenson
| 0
|
| Economy is much better now
| Dominique Contreras
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] exclusions versus alreadySearched
| Mark Ennis
| 0
|
| [no subject]
| Alison
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] exclusions versus alreadySearched
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| Pre-Qualified M[o]rtgage Application
| Dina Dukes
| 0
|
| lime
| Mccain
| 0
|
| Re:
| Etta
| 0
|
| Re: disdainful lovelorn
| Dominique
| 0
|
| Incredible Software Deals. berenices sabra coed condemnate
| Charity Hodges
| 0
|
| [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 3
|
| Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 1
|
| Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 1
|
| Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Mark Ennis
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| Application Approved
| Chris Vera
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 1
|
| Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Mark Ennis
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Mark Ennis
| 0
|
| RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Ramsay, Ron
| 0
|
| RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| Re: orphic bloop
| Adeline
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Ennis, Mark
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| [ldapext] superior of subrDSE while chaining a resolved operation
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| ref DN != reference name (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| [ldapext] Re: superior of subrDSE while chaining a resolved operation
| Ennis, Mark
| 0
|
| Purpose of unableToProceed (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Ramsay, Ron
| 0
|
| Need for operationProgress (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| Re: ref DN != reference name (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Ennis, Mark
| 0
|
| RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Ramsay, Ron
| 0
|
| Re: Purpose of unableToProceed (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Ennis, Mark
| 0
|
| RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| Re: Need for operationProgress (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Ennis, Mark
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Ramsay, Ron
| 0
|
| RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Ennis, Mark
| 0
|
| RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Ramsay, Ron
| 0
|
| [ldapext] ChainedOperation.targetObject (are nssr's required)?
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| [ldapext] searchable archive?
| Jim Sermersheim
| 1
|
| Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Mark Ennis
| 1
|
| RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Ramsay, Ron
| 1
|
| [ldapext] Distributed Procedures Requirements
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] searchable archive?
| Mark Smith
| 0
|
| Re: [ldapext] searchable archive?
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
| chaining SASL binds (Was: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
| chaining binds (Was: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
| Re: chaining SASL binds (Was: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| Proxied AuthZ (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
| Re: Proxied AuthZ (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
| Re: Proxied AuthZ (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Jim Sermersheim
| 1
|
| Re: chaining SASL binds (Was: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
| Re: Proxied AuthZ (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| John McMeeking
| 0
|
| [ldapext] Is exclude subtree useful outside of chained operations?
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|