is LDAP-server-finding ldapext or lsd?

[RL 'Bob' Morgan <rlmorgan@cac.washington.edu>]

Ryan Moats wrote:

> This draft replaces draft-moats-ldap-taxonomy-00 as this is now a
> working group item.

Perhaps someone who was in Oslo (since as far as I can tell there have
been no ldapext minutes published, and only a one-paragraph version of
lsd; nudge-nudge) can tell the rest of us about the disposition of the
finding-ldap-servers topic.  I see that the SRV records topic was on the 
ldapext agenda.  

It seems to me that if lsd were a flourishing WG, this topic would be
squarely in its camp; and that putting it into ldapext likely will take
some substantial motivation away from actually having a lsd WG.  This may
not be a bad thing, but it would be nice to know what (if anything) was
discussed about the relations among this work item and these two
(one real and one potential) WGs.

 - RL "Bob"