[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Protocol: control specifications.

I wrote:

>>> As important as rejecting cleartext password binds done without TLS.
>> Bad example.  Use of cleartext passwords without TLS is not a protocol
>> error.
> I didn't mean to imply it was.  It is example of what Ron called
>   "I didn't do it. I could have but, na-na-na, you got the (***)
>   wrong. Let that teach you a lesson!"
> which, as it happens, this example was a reply to.

Before someone complains: I just noticed that I read of 'wrong' as
something like 'bad, therefore unsupported here' while Ron probably
meant 'error'.  Except for that, the point is the same.