[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Protocol: control specifications.

I'm guessing that you mis-read my statement because I can't see how the semantics statement affect the problem I mention.

>>> Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> 3/8/04 11:51:13 AM >>>
Jim Sermersheim writes:
> - If there are cases where clients have a need to set the criticality
> to false, and also be notified whether the control was applied, then
> the control specification ought to provide some return control for
> purposes of acknowledgment.

...if the control was applied. True, but that's another issue.
I think it's covered by this text in the draft:

(note: the semantics of the criticality field
are defined above should not be altered by the control's