[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Protocol: control specifications.

Jim Sermersheim writes:
> - If there are cases where clients have a need to set the criticality
> to false, and also be notified whether the control was applied, then
> the control specification ought to provide some return control for
> purposes of acknowledgment.

...if the control was applied.  True, but that's another issue.
I think it's covered by this text in the draft:

     (note: the semantics of the criticality field 
     are defined above should not be altered by the control's