Issue 5399 - LDAP Syntax 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.58 (Substring Assertion) not listed in subschema subentry
Summary: LDAP Syntax 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.58 (Substring Assertion) not listed in...
Status: VERIFIED SUSPENDED
Alias: None
Product: OpenLDAP
Classification: Unclassified
Component: slapd (show other issues)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All All
: --- enhancement
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: OpenLDAP project
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-02-29 11:56 UTC by Michael Ströder
Modified: 2023-10-09 17:07 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Michael Ströder 2008-02-29 11:56:08 UTC
Full_Name: Michael Str�der
Version: HEAD
OS: 
URL: 
Submission from: (NULL) (84.163.114.177)


Although implemnted since 2.0 the LDAP Syntax with 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.58
(Substring Assertion) is not listed in subschema subentry.

Comment 1 Kurt Zeilenga 2008-02-29 17:37:18 UTC
On Feb 29, 2008, at 1:56 AM, michael@stroeder.com wrote:

> Full_Name: Michael Ströder
> Version: HEAD
> OS:
> URL:
> Submission from: (NULL) (84.163.114.177)
>
>
> Although implemnted since 2.0 the LDAP Syntax with  
> 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.58
> (Substring Assertion) is not listed in subschema subentry.

IIRC, it's not listed because it only to be used in certain  
(extensible) matching rules cases and slapd(8) doesn't support any of  
those cases.

I noticed that this came up because someone was trying to use this  
syntax an attribute description.  That attribute description is likely  
bogus.



Comment 2 ando@openldap.org 2008-03-01 15:11:56 UTC
changed notes
changed state Open to Suspended
Comment 3 ando@openldap.org 2008-03-01 15:12:06 UTC
kurt@OpenLDAP.org wrote:

> IIRC, it's not listed because it only to be used in certain  
> (extensible) matching rules cases and slapd(8) doesn't support any of  
> those cases.

Technically, I note it's skipped by syn_schema_info() because it has no
validator (like many other known syntaxes).  I don't recall the reason
of this behavior, though.  Perhaps it could be relaxed.

p.



Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
OpenLDAP Core Team

SysNet s.r.l.
via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
http://www.sys-net.it
---------------------------------------
Office:  +39 02 23998309
Mobile:  +39 333 4963172
Email:   pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it
---------------------------------------


Comment 4 ando@openldap.org 2008-03-01 15:12:08 UTC
changed notes
Comment 5 ando@openldap.org 2010-04-21 18:04:49 UTC
changed notes
Comment 6 OpenLDAP project 2017-03-27 23:21:31 UTC
skipped because it has no validator (why?)
patch welcome
Comment 7 Quanah Gibson-Mount 2017-03-27 23:21:31 UTC
changed notes
changed state Suspended to Open
moved from Incoming to Software Bugs
Comment 8 Quanah Gibson-Mount 2021-06-03 16:32:58 UTC
Hi Michael,

Do you have an example test case/use case you can provide?
Comment 9 Quanah Gibson-Mount 2023-10-09 17:07:53 UTC
suspending due to lack of use case.