Dieter Klünter wrote:
> slapo-unique(5) plus slapo-constraint(5)
Interesting, I hadn't that in mind. Unfortunately I think Michael is right that using a constraint in this scenario won't work. But I have other uses for slapo-contraint in mind already.
IMHO this does not work without adding all possible values to at least
one of the attributes *or* SUP-ing all attribute values from a common
attribute type.
How would attribute inheritance tie into this? I'm relatively free in modifying our ldap schema so making mailAlias SUP mail would be possible.