Re: Antw: Re: Olc deployment vs slapd.conf based deployment

[Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com>]

--On Tuesday, September 19, 2017 11:54 AM +0200 Radovan Semancik 
<radovan.semancik@evolveum.com> wrote:

> Regarding the pull requests and discussions: I have checked the devel
> mailing list for several months and I haven't see any discussion
> regarding a contribution.

Really? You must not have looked very hard then.

<http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/201709/msg00000.html> covers 
some 22 contributions.

<http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/201709/msg00003.html> 
discussions some contributions related to man page fixes.

<http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/201706/msg00004.html> covers 
work I did to make TLS command line options for the ldap* tools

<http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/201706/msg00006.html> is part 
of an ongoing discussion of allowing ldap clients to use a specific local 
address

<http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/201706/msg00000.html> is a 
discussion about adding ldap_init_fd contribution from samba


etc.


> What I see as a major problem is that there is no will. OpenLDAP project
> clearly needs major improvement. But there are almost no contributors to
> improve the project.

As demonstrated by the above you clearly are incorrect.  I would generally 
suggest you withhold comment on the project until you have some clue what 
you're talking about.

--Quanah


--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Product Architect
Symas Corporation
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:
<http://www.symas.com>